I’d like to put the record straight and say that the Sony a7 battery life is better than all the reviews say.

A year ago, I bought a Sony a7. Not the Sony a7s and not the Sony a7r, just the plain and bog standard a7. Now there’s a strange description for a 24.3-megapixel full-frame camera with interchangeable Zeiss lenses. The reason I chose the “basic” model was that I was simply looking for a good camera that was more lightweight and portable than my Nikon DSLRs. After considerable research, I decided to give the mirrorless system a try and Sony looked like the best bet. Yes, the Sony a7r does have a lot more resolution at 36.4MP but it is also more expensive and I wasn’t sure if mirrorless was the way forward for me.

During my research, I kept on being scared off by the endless stream of reviews that warned prospective buyers that the Sony a7 battery life was awful. Statements like,

“In real life tests, I would only get about 230 to 250 shots out of a single battery”.

Firstly, what is a “real-life” test and what is not a “real-life” test? Why would a unreal-life test be any different? Anyway, I don’t want this to become a rant.

In the past year of owning and using my Sony a7 (in real-life), I can assure you that I get far more than 230 – 250 shots from a single charge. For example, I enjoy shooting time-lapse sequences which regularly contain either 600 or 800 images, which I can manage easily with one battery. If I couldn’t, all my time-lapse videos would be impossible if the Sony a7 battery life was not up to the task. Even after shooting the time-lapse sequence, I still have enough battery power to take a good number of still images. I’m not sure exactly how many still images I have taken after shooting a time-lapse sequence, but it’s enough not to ever moan about the battery life.

I’ve just realised, as I write this, that I sound like an advert for Sony. Oops! I wish I was.

Here are my “real-life” findings of the Sony a7 battery life:

  • I can easily get over 800 shots from one battery;
  • I bought extra batteries;
  • The camera is a fraction of the size and weight of a DSLR, and so too is the battery. Therefore, it’s bound to have less juice but it’s not as bad as all the reviews say. Honestly, it’s just not;
  • The batteries charge a lot quicker than DSLR batteries.

I don’t do camera reviews because there are thousands of others doing them and I’m very grateful. But, I had to make an exception here because I have no idea where this Sony a7 battery life myth has come from.

“Put a hat on. It’s cold outside. Most of your body heat is lost through your head, you know.” Rubbish! Because everyone else say’s it, it must be true?

Some will argue against me because their real-life experience is different from my real-life experience and that’s fine. I’m not saying every single real-life is wrong, I am saying they are not all correct. Otherwise, how would I manage to shoot a time-lapse made from 800 images?

One last thing!

Even if the Sony a7 battery life did last for “only” 230 shots, wouldn’t that be enough for a day’s photography? When we shot film, we only had 36 exposures on one roll of film. It may just be me, but if you’re struggling to make one battery last for a day’s shoot and you can “only” get 230 shots, then maybe you’re taking too many shots. Just a thought!

Conclusion

I love my Sony a7 and I will definitely be upgrading to the Sony a7rii when I’ve saved up enough money and excuses. In the meantime, I’ll keep using my bog standard full-frame 24.3MP Sony a7 for stills and time-lapse with not so rubbish batteries.

Don’t be put off by the Sony a7 battery life nonsense. Please comment below and let us know what your findings and thoughts are. Thank you.